OATdb Archive

2013 - 2014

Sociology, Department Of

Goal
Effective Teaching
The Department of Sociology provides high quality teaching.

Objective
Faculty Teaching
The Department of Sociology provides high quality teaching that disseminates knowledge on social life, social change, and the causes and consequences of human behavior.


KPI
IDEA Student Ratings
At least 70% of the classes taught by the tenured/tenure-track faculty will have IDEA student teaching evaluation ratings at or above a score of 3.8, which is the minimum score required in the Department of Sociology Promotion and Tenure Manual. At least 60% of the classes taught by non-tenure-track faculty will have IDEA student teaching evaluation ratings at or above a score of 3.8.


Result
IDEA Student Ratings
86% of Sociology classes taught by tenure-track and tenured faculty were at or above a score of 3.8 on the IDEA student teaching evaluations, and 100% of Sociology classes taught by non-tenure-track were at or above a score of 3.8 on the IDEA student teaching evaluations.

KPI
Chair's Teaching Evaluation
Each Sociology faculty member will prepare annually the SHSU Faculty Evaluation System form that contains his/her academic activities (Research, Teaching and Service). This form will be used to assess faculty production in teaching. A score of 3.0 or more on the Chair’s Rating of Teaching Effectiveness section of the FES Summary Report Form is considered satisfactory for tenured/tenure-track faculty. It will be considered satisfactory if 80% of tenured/tenure-track faculty members and 70% of non-tenure-track faculty members obtain a score of 3.0 or greater.

Result
Chair's Teaching Evaluation
One hundred percent of tenured/tenure-track faculty members and 100% of non-tenure-track faculty members received a score of 3.0 or greater on the Chair's Rating of Teaching Effectiveness section of the FES Summary Report Form. Strengths of the faculty included: developing well organized, comprehensive syllabi for all assigned courses; adhering to syllabi; teaching appropriate and relevant materials pertaining to subject matter(s) of courses; adhering to scheduled class meeting times; maintaining appropriate professional demeanor in teaching situations; using fair and appropriate grading practices; participating in the peer-review of teaching process; and, engaging in professional development aimed at improving teaching effectiveness. Weaknesses for a minority of faculty included: maintaining a campus presence and holding appropriate office hours; participating in professional development activities; and, maintaining above-average annual ratings on student teaching evaluations in each class instructed.

Action
Faculty Teaching Effectiveness
The data of the IDEA student teaching evaluation ratings and the Chair’s Rating of Teaching Effectiveness section of the FES Summary Report Form indicate that the desired results are exceeded. The Chair discussed the weaknesses with the minority of faculty members and suggested ways to remedy the situation. The faculty members will continue to be encouraged to maintain high quality teaching and engaged in professional development activities aimed at improving teaching effectiveness.

Goal
Scholarly Research
The Department of Sociology will engage in high-quality scholarly activities.


Objective
Scholarly Research
The Faculty will produce high-quality research that investigates the structure of groups, organizations, and societies and how people interact within these contexts.


KPI
Faculty Research Publications
At least 70% of the tenured/tenure-track faculty will publish at least one peer-reviewed journal article (or equivalent, as determined by the Equivalence Chart in the Department of Sociology’s Promotion and Tenure Manual).


Result
Faculty Research Publications
83% of the tenured/tenure-track faculty members published at least one peer-reviewed journal article (or equivalent).

KPI
Faculty Research Presentation
At least 80% of the tenured/tenure-track faculty will present their scholarship at professional conferences. Non-tenured-track faculty will be encouraged to present their scholarly works at professional conferences.

Result
Faculty Research Presentation
100% of the tenured/tenure-track faculty members presented a paper at a professional conference in 2013.


KPI
Faculty Grant Activity
Sociology faculty members are encouraged to seek internal and/or external grant opportunities. At least 50% of the tenured/tenure-track faculty members will submit one internal and/or external grant proposal, with the expectation that the proposal(s) will be funded.

Result
Faculty Grant Activity
50% of the tenured/tenure-track faculty members submitted at least one internal or external grant proposal in 2013.

Action
Faculty Scholarly Research
The results of three KPI indicators indicate that the desired objective of the faculty scholarly research was successfully achieved. The department will continue to encourage and support the faculty members to actively produce high-quality research.

Objective
Student Scholarly Research
Students in the Department of Sociology will produce scholarly research works with the support and mentoring of the faculty.

KPI
Student Research Presentations
The Department of Sociology values nurturing students’ academic maturity and professionalism beyond the classroom setting. Undergraduate students will be encouraged to present their research works at the SHSU Undergraduate Symposium and/or regional professional conferences. Graduate students will be encouraged to present their research works at regional or national professional conferences.

Result
Student Research Presentations
In 2013, seven graduate students were co-authors with faculty members on 16 conference presentations.

In 2013, four undergraduate students were co-authors with faculty on eight conference presentations.


Action
Student Research Presentations
The data indicate that both undergraduate and graduate students were engaged in scholarly research activities and produced scholarly research works with mentoring of the faculty. The department will continue to encourage and support Sociology students to engage in scholarly research activities with the support and mentoring of the faculty of the Department of Sociology.

Goal
Service
Faculty will provide service to the department, university, profession and community.


Objective
Provision Of Quality Service
Faculty in the Department of Sociology will provide service to the department, university, profession and community and engage in leadership roles in the profession.


KPI
Service Activities
Each Sociology tenured/tenure-track faculty member will prepare annually the SHSU Faculty Evaluation System form that contains his/her academic activities (Research, Teaching and Service). This form will be used to assess successful completion of service. A score of 3.0 or more on the Service section of the FES Summary Report Form is considered satisfactory. It will be considered satisfactory if 80% of tenured/tenure-track faculty members obtain a score of 3.0 or greater.

Result
Service Activities
100% of tenured/tenure-track faculty members obtained a score of 3.0 or greater on the Service section of the FES Summary Report Form. Strengths of the faculty included service to the department (i.e., attendance/participation in department activities/events, student recruitment, student mentoring, and committee service) and service to the profession (i.e., membership in professional associations, attendance at annual meetings/conferences or professional associations, and completing ad hoc manuscript reviews). Weaknesses for a minority of faculty members included: service to the college (attendance/participation in college activities, such as CHSS Convocation and CHSS Colloquia) and service to the university (attendance/participation in university activities/events, such as University Commencement).

KPI
Leadership Roles In The Profession
The Department of Sociology encourages and provides resources for faculty to engage in leadership roles in the profession. At least 50% of the tenure-track and tenured faculty will take a leadership role in the profession at regional, state, national, and/or international levels. The leadership role includes officer and board members in state, regional, national, and/or international organization, as well as editorships (e.g., editor, associate/assistant editor, or editorial review board for journals).

Result
Leadership Roles In The Profession
83% of the tenured/tenure-track faculty members held a leadership role in professional associations at the regional, state, national, and/or international levels.


Action
Provision Of Quality Service
Both data of the Chair’s Rating of the Service section of the FES Summary Report Form and the leadership roles in the profession indicate that the desired results are exceeded. The department will continue to encourage the faulty to provide excellent service to the department, college, and university, as well as to take leadership roles on the profession.

Goal
Curriculum Enhancement
The Department of Sociology will provide students quality teaching through development and advancement of curriculum.

Objective
Curriculum Development
The Department of Sociology will develop and offer students various sociology courses via multiple delivery methods to accommodate the students’ need.  

KPI
Graduate Program: New Course Development
The sociology graduate program has experienced a notable increase of student enrollment. New graduate courses will be developed to accommodate the increased students’ needs and enrollment.

Result
Graduate Program: New Course Development
In 2013, two new graduate courses were proposed and approved by the Academic Affairs Council. The two courses are: SOCI 5313 Qualitative Methods and SOCI 5338 Sociology of Disasters.

KPI
Undergraduate Program: New Course Development
New undergraduate courses will be developed and offered to students.

Result
Undergraduate Program: New Course Development
In 2013, one new undergraduate course was proposed and approved by the Academic Affairs Council. This course is SOCI 3327 Sociology of Popular Culture.

KPI
Undergraduate Program: Promoting Instructional Delivery
The need for online sociology courses has been increasing among students. More online courses will be offered in the 2013-2014 academic year.

Result
Undergraduate Program: Promoting Instructional Delivery
Three sociology courses are newly offered as an online format: SOCI 3324 (Social Inequality), SOCI3327 (Sociology of Popular Culture), and SOCI3338 (Socialization, Social Control, and Deviant Social Behavior).


Action
Curriculum Development
The results indicate the objective is achieved by developing and offering new courses and increasing online format courses. The department will continue to make efforts in curriculum development to accommodate the increased students’ enrollment and their needs.

Objective
Curriculum Advancement
The Department of Sociology will promote guidance and support for students’ degree plans and class schedules.  

KPI
Undergraduate Program: Scheduling Flexibility
The core courses were provided either on the Monday/Wednesday or Tuesday/Thursday schedule until the 2013-2014 academic year. The Department of Sociology will offer the core courses on both the Monday/Wednesday or Tuesday/Thursday schedules to support the students’ flexibility of scheduling.  

Result
Undergraduate Program: Scheduling Flexibility
Beginning fall 2013, the sociology core courses have been offered to students on both the Monday/Wednesday and Tuesday/Thursday schedules.


KPI
Undergraduate Program: Aligning The BS And BA Programs
The credit hours for the BA and BS programs will be standardized to better align with the new core curriculum and to eliminate confusion for students.  

Result
Undergraduate Program: Aligning The BS And BA Programs
The Department of Sociology has required different credit hours in Sociology for the BA and BS programs: 34 credit hours for the BA and 40 credit hours for the BS. The credit hours for the BA and BS programs are standardized into 37 credit hours in Sociology and reflected in the 2014-2016 catalogue. 

Action
Curriculum Advancement
The data indicate that the objective of curriculum advancement is achieved by scheduling flexibility of the undergraduate core courses and standardizing the credit hours for the BA and BS program. The department will continue to make efforts to promote guide and support for students’ degree plans and class schedules.



Update to previous cycle's plan for continuous improvement

The Chair monitored and met with each faculty member to discuss their teaching, research, and service performance during the 2013-2014 cycle. We added several new indicators for teaching, research and service based on the objectives we included in the 2013-2014 cycle. Regarding teaching, we included the IDEA score as an indicator, in addition to the Chair’s teaching evaluation. Because of the increase in non-tenure track faculty teaching in the department, it is important to document their teaching performance to design necessary pedagogical interventions. Therefore, we also included the non-tenure track faculty in the teaching performance evaluation. Regarding research, we itemized the Chair’s evaluation used in the 2012-2013 cycle to include research publications, presentations, and grant activities to enhance the robustness of the assessment protocol. To enhance student learning and skill development outside of the classroom, we also included undergraduate and graduate students’ scholarly research activities in the 2013-2014 cycle. Regarding service, we added faculty leadership roles in the profession as an additional indicator to promote SHSU’s reputation at the regional, national, and international levels. The components of the 2012-2013 Plan for Continuous Improvement were implemented during the 2013-2014 cycle.   


Plan for continuous improvement During the 2013-2014 cycle the assessment results reveal that we met the desired performance indicators in research, teaching, and service. Our plans for continuous improvement in the 2014-2015 cycle include: (1) Regarding teaching we will raise the desired performance level of the IDEA student teaching evaluation rating for each tenure and non-tenure track faculty members from 3.8 to 4.0. For the Chair’s teaching evaluation indicator, the Chair will conduct an item by item analysis of the Chair’s rubric criteria scores to identify pedagogical weaknesses for each faculty member and improve pedagogical proficiency. To accomplish this objective, we will suggest and provide support for various interventions, including travel support for teaching conferences, online tutorials, American Sociological Association teaching support documents, and/or peer evaluation interventions from the PACE Center.  (2) Regarding research we will increase the desired results from 70% to 90% of tenured and tenure-track faculty publishing at least one peer-reviewed journal article, or equivalent (as determined by the Equivalence Chart in the Department of Sociology’s Promotion and Tenure Manual). This change in indicator is based on the Sociology Department’s Promotion and Tenure Manual, which indicates that tenured and tenure-track should average at least one peer-reviewed journal article or equivalent to satisfy tenure and post-tenure review requirements. In line with increased emphasis regarding intramural and extramural grant funding by the University, College, and Department, and given that we achieved our desired indicator for faculty grant activity during the 2013-2014 cycle, we will raise the desired performance indicator from 50% to 60%. To facilitate the desired indicator of increased grant activity, we will develop a departmental summer research support initiative. Regarding students scholarly research activities, the department will continue to provide support in the form of mentorship for research activities and travel support to present their research at professional conferences. (3) Regarding service the results for the 2013-2014 cycle indicate that the Sociology faculty members are very active in service at the department, college, university, professional association, and community levels. We will continue to support faculty to maintain their high level of service commitment.

In the 2013-2014 cycle we included a new goal, curriculum enhancement, to provide students quality teaching through development and advancement of curriculum. We developed and implemented new graduate and undergraduate courses and instructional delivery methods. We enhanced course schedule flexibility for undergraduate students by offering the core courses on both a Tuesday/Thursday and Monday/Wednesday schedule. We will continue to engage curriculum enhancement based on students’ expressed needs. Regarding the graduate program, the department has introduced a new track (thesis track) starting in fall 2014. We will develop the assessment tools to evaluate student’s learning outcomes regarding this track. The Department and Graduate Committee will conduct a survey to (1) assess students’ needs, their level of preparation for graduate studies, and (2) to develop a strategic plan to improve students’ learning, student retention, and matriculation.