Provide An Effective Academic Learning Community (LC) Program
Residential and non-residential learning communities will demonstrate similar or higher academic success.
Objective
Grade Point Average (GPA) Similarities
Students who participate in either a residential or non-residential academic freshman learning community program will earn GPAs at the same or higher levels than their First Time Freshman (FTF) cohort peers.
KPI
GPA Similarities
LC students will be compared to FTF peers with respect to mean GPAs. Students who participate in either a residential or non-residential academic freshman learning community program will earn GPAs at the same or higher levels than their FTF freshman cohort peers.
Result
First-Year Experience GPA LC & Non-LC Results
Source: Institutional Research Report on First-Year Student Cohort 2012-2013 Institutional Research Report indicates Grade Point Averages (GPAs). Our standard for success in comparable results for First-Year Learning Community students and for those in the overall first-year cohort.
First-Year Experience Results
Grade Point Average (GPA) 2012-2013 Comparison
Residential Learning Community - BLC = 2.608
Non Residential Learning Community - FLC= 2.652
UNIV 1301 overall - 2.525
PREP Students - 2.311
Non BLC/FLC = 2.561
Overall freshman= 2.569
Action
Fall To Fall 2013 GPAs Will Be Reported For The Prior Academic Year
Fall 2012-Fall 2013 GPAs for students in both residential and non-residential learning communities were reported as higher than GPAs for students who did not participate in Learning Communities. Though the results indicate a high level of effectiveness on student learning, we will add additional out of class academic seminars and increase PREP student (lower SAT &/or class rank than peers) participation in the BLC for improved results next year.
Action
Program Assessment Report
SHSU Institutional Research reported on the 20th class day of fall 2013 semester for 2012-2013 First-time freshman cohort will service as evidence of the completion of this objective.
Objective
Learning Community Retention Achievement
Students who participate in either a residential or non-residential academic freshman learning community program will be retained from fall to fall at higher levels that their FTF freshman cohort peers.
KPI
Retention Achievement
LC students will be compared to FTF peers with respect to % retunring for fall of a second year of study. Students who participate in either a residential or non-residential academic freshman learning community program maintain higher retention percentages than their FTF freshman cohort peers.
Result
Retention Assessment Results
First-Year Experience Results
Retention Percentages for freshman enrolled in fall 2012 - to fall 2013 Comparison
BLC = 78%
FLC= 77%
Non BLC/FLC = 77%
Overall freshman cohort = 77%
Action
Increased Programming For LC Students
To continue our efforts in building cohort cohesiveness and we will increase meaningful Service Learning projects and other out-of class faculty/student programming for LC students.
In addition, the First-Year Experience office will investigate research-based alternative methods for improving retention of our student population.
Moreover, we will design our LC recruitment efforts to expand the number of learning communities to serve more students.
Goal
Provide An Effective Freshman College Success Course
SHSU will provide freshman with a course designed to help freshmen develop skills necessary for college success.
Objective
Retention Similarity
Students who complete a UNIV 1301: An Introduction to Collegiate Studies course will be retained at higher levels than their FTF freshman cohort peers.
KPI
Similarity In Retention
UNIV 1301 students will be compared to FTF peer cohort with respect retention fall to fall. Students who complete a UNIV 1301 course will be retained at higher levels than their FTF freshman cohort peers.
Result
2012-2013 Retention Comparison Result
Fall 2012 to fall 2013 1-year Retention Percentages for freshman enrolled in UNIV 1301 and not enrolled in UNIV 1301
UNIV 1301 = 76%
Non- UNIV 1301 = 78%
Composite freshman cohort = 77%
Action
Retention Initiative For PREP Students
54% of students who participated in this class were required to due to the fact that SAT/ACT or class rank fell slightly below the college admissions requirements, and as such, traditionally have lower GPA’s. To better serve the student population the Student Success Initiatives office will report college-readiness indicators of both groups to look for gaps in learning and address these issues. While these students are being retained at a respectable level (76%) more needs to be done to engage these learners to encourage retention at levels similar to their peers. Additional service learning and civic engagement activies will be explored and implemented. Second semester interventions will also be explored.
Objective
GPA Comparability
Students who complete a UNIV 1301: An Introduction to Collegiate Studies course will earn GPAs at the same or higher levels than their FTF freshman cohort peers.
KPI
Similar GPAs Between UNIV 1301 And Remaining FTF Cohort Peers
UNIV 1301 students will be compared to FTF peers with respect to mean GPA’s. Students who complete a UNIV 1301 course will earn GPAs at the same or higher levels than their FTF freshman cohort peers.
Result
GPA Comparison Between UNIV 1301 Students And Non-UNIV 1301 Students
UNIV 1301 Freshman College Success Course Results
Grade Point Average (GPA) 2012-2013 Comparison
GPA for students who completed UNIV 1301 College Success course = 2.525
GPA for students who did not complete UNIV 1301 College Success course = 2.581
Overall freshman= 2.569
Action
Student Needs Assessment
54% of students who participated in this class were required to do so under the SHSU PREP program. PREP student SAT or class rank fell slightly below the college admissions requirements, and as such, these students were required to take this class. To better serve the student population the Student Success Initiatives office will report college-readiness indicators of both groups to look for gaps in learning and address these issues. Moreover, the Student Success Initiatives office will conduct a review to address where the gaps in pre-college learning most occurred and will consider infusing curriculum into the course that addresses these issues.