MA Kinesiology students will be able to format references in scholarly works in the correct APA format.
Objective
Research Skills/APA Formatting:
MA Kinesiology students will be able to format references in scholarly works in the correct APA format.
Indicator
Research Skills/APA Formatting Mastery
A rubric developed by the program faculty will be used to assess students' research skills regarding properly formatting references using APA. Students will be distributed a comprehensive list of references. Students must follow APA format when formatting these references. Students must use the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.) for proper formatting. Students must organize these sources into a 'References' page similar to what you would see at the end of an article or research manuscript.
Criterion
Research Skills/APA Formatting Assignment
Students must correctly format a comprehensive list of references in APA style, 6th edition with 95 percent accuracy on the first evaluation. This list will include references from a wide range of resources and the information provided will challenge students to seek out additional information about each resource.
Finding
Research Skills/APA Formatting Assignment
The results from the 2012-2013 Academic Year indicated that only 61.1% of students achieved a score of 95 or higher on the initial submission of the APA Formatting Assignment, while 88.9% of students achieved a score of 90 or higher on the initial submission.
Action
Research Skills-APA Formatting
As this was the first year to collect information on this particular criterion measure, we felt as students’ initial performance was good overall, but could be better in future years. Thus, we recommend continuing with the current assessment while trying to incorporate other elements or feedback into the assignment to enhance students’ initial performance in this area. Given the difference between the 90th and 95th percentile ranking on the assignment, we would also recommend that the criterion be adjusted down to 90 percent accuracy for the initial submission, after which time the criterion can be adjusted to a higher level later.
Goal
Basic Statistics Interpretation
MA Kinesiology students will be able to interpret basic statistical findings that address descriptive statistics (i.e., descriptives), group differences (i.e., analysis of variance (ANOVA), prediction (i.e., simple and multiple regression), and nonparametic statistics (i.e., Chi-square).
Objective
Basic Statistics Interpretation
MA Kinesiology students will be able to interpret basic statistical findings that address descriptive statistics (i.e., descriptives), group differences (i.e., analysis of variance (ANOVA), prediction (i.e., simple and multiple regression), and nonparametic statistics (i.e., Chi-square).
Indicator
Basic Statistics Interpretation Mastery
Assignments developed by program faculty will assess students’ ability to correctly interpret statistical findings that emerge from analysis conducted in SPSS. Students will be distributed a dataset and will be asked to execute different methods of analysis to address appropriate research questions. Students will then complete written assignments that address each particular type of analysis, which then be evaluated by a rubric developed by program faculty.
Criterion
Statistics Interpretation Assignments
Students must correctly complete each of the statistics assignments attached to this objective with 80 percent accuracy. There will be a total of four assignments that address descriptive statistics (i.e., descriptives), group differences (i.e., analysis of variance (ANOVA), prediction (i.e., simple and multiple regression), and nonparametic statistics (i.e., Chi-square). In each case, the expectation is that the student will achieve a minimum of 80 percent mastery on each assignment, not a cumulative 80 percent on the four assignments.
This is a new objective this year, so we will be gathering baseline data.
Finding
Statistics Interpretation Assignments
The results from the 2012-2013 Academic Year indicated that students met the criteria on the first three assignments in the following manner:
Assignment #1 (Descriptives): 100% at 80 percent or higher
Assignment #2 (Group Differences): 94.4% at 80 percent or higher
Assignment #3 (Prediction): 81.3% at 80 percent or higher
Action
Statistical Interpretation
The target criterion was met on the first three assignments. Assignment #4 (Nonparametric Statistics), however, saw a significant drop in performance with only 53.8% of students reaching the 80 percent mastery criterion on the assignment. As indicated in the original criterion, we were targeting 80 percent mastery on each of the four assignments as opposed to a cumulative 80 percent. Thus, the Action Plan for this objective will involve revisiting the assignment and approach to nonparametric statistics to improve performance in subsequent years. Additionally, student performance on the Group Differences and Prediction assignments will be targeted for continued improvement.
Goal
Cumulative Professional Development
MA Kinesiology students will be able to use their acquired knowledge, skills, and experience in a field experience setting.
Objective
Cumulative Professional Development
MA Kinesiology students will be able to use their acquired knowledge, skills, and experience in a field experience setting.
Indicator
Cumulative Professional Development Mastery
Students will be able to demonstrate professional competency in an applied setting. Students will engage in a variety of assignments including monthly blogs, weekly internship logs, and a cumulative reflection paper in order to demonstrate summary professional development. The cumulative portfolio is evaluated via a rubric established by program faculty. Students’ cumulative performance will also be evaluated by their internship site supervisor via a rubric established by program faculty.
Criterion
Site Supervisor Evaluation And Professional Portfolio
Students’ final internship evaluation from the site supervisor must reach a minimum of an 85 percent rating. Additionally, the professional portfolio and all accompanying assignments presented by the student must also attain a minimum of an 85 percent rating.
Baseliline data will be gathered as this is a new objective in 2012-2013.
Finding
Site Supervisor Evaluation And Professional Portfolio
Students’ cumulative performance on the final portfolio submission (93.4%) and the site supervisor ratings (86.5%) indicate that this criterion was attained for the 2012-2013 Academic Year.
Action
Professional Development Mastery
It is recommended that the criterion be moved forward to a 90 percent rating on both dimensions in order better develop student performance in their capstone experience. While an eventual 100 percent rating in both dimensions would be ideal, it may be difficult to accomplish given the nature of the indicator and the involvement of external raters (i.e., site supervisor ratings). Thus, a 90 percent rating in both areas would represent significant progress for the coming Academic Year.