OATdb Archive

2009 - 2010

Speech Communication MA

Goal
Research Literacy
To understand, assess, and report the results of communication research

Objective
Research Literacy
Graduate students will be able to understand, assess, and report the findings of communication research

Indicator
Research Literacy
We will measure this goal with an annual evaluation of a sample of graduate student papers assigned in each graduate course taught in the Spring semester. The components of this rubric include: Control of the Mechanics of Written Composition and Evidence of a Comprehensive Knowledge of a Confined Research Area. The Communication Studies faculty met as a committee of the whole to develop consensus on the rubric and its components and to develop a Likert-type rating scale to be used as a holistic measure. The resulting numeric scale is as follows: 1=fails to meet the goal, 2=minimally meets the goal, 3=satisfactorily meets the goal, 4=meets the goal in an exemplary fashion, 5=exceeds expectations in meeting the goal. 1 = serious deficiencies in both components. 2 = moderate deficiency in no more than one component. 3 = no deficiency in either component. 4 = superior handling of both components. 5 = near flawless handling of both components.

Criterion
Research Literacy
An average grade of 4 is the criterion for satisfying the target outcome. This average will be taken over all literature reviews and all reviewers (faculty committee).

Finding
Research Literacy
The average score for graduate student research papers was 4.40.

Action
Research Literacy
Since the average grade exceeded the criterion this year, the faculty believes that the efforts made for improvement over last year's scores were generally successful.  The faculty will continue to emphasize special attention to critical thinking about published research.  This emphasis will include additional student critiques of publications in class with oral assessment by the teacher.


Goal
Understanding Of Theory
Graduate students will be able to understand the applicable theories of communication and related fields. The teaching philosophy of the graduate faculty is that the understanding of theory and the ability to understand, assess, and report the findings of communication research are practically inseparable. They are not the same thing, but each occurs in the context of the other. Paper assignments in the majority of graduate classes reflect this pairing, and the artifacts being evaluated in this objective will be the same as those in the Research Literacy goal.

Objective
Understanding Of Theory
Graduate students will be able to understand the applicable theories of communication and related fields.

Indicator
Understanding Of Theory
We will measure this goal with an annual evaluation of a sample of graduate student papers assigned in each graduate course taught in the Spring semester. The components of this rubric are: Control of the Mechanics of Written Composition and Evidence of Understanding of the Applicable Theory or Theories. The Communication Studies faculty met as a committee of the whole to develop consensus on the rubric and its components and to construct a Likert-type rating scale to be used as a holistic measure. The resulting numeric scale is as follows: 1=fails to meet the goal; 2=minimally meets the goal; 3=satisfactorily meets the goal; 4=meets the goal in an exemplary fashion; 5=exceeds expectations in meeting the goal. 1 = serious deficiencies in both components. 2 = moderate deficiency in no more than one component. 3 = no deficiency in either component. 4 = superior handling of both components. 5 = near flawless handling of both components.

Criterion
Understanding of Theory
An average score of 4 is the criterion for satisfying the target outcome. This average will be taken over all literature reviews and all reviewers (faculty committee).

Finding
Understanding Of Theory
The average score for graduate student research papers was 4.40.

Action
Understanding Of Theory
This year's results represent an improvement over last year's and success in exceeding the established criterion.  As with the goal of research literacy, the faculty will continue to emphasize explanation and application of communication research and theory in each of its graduate classes.  Particular attention will be given to student reports on specific theories and subsequent peer evaluation.


Update to previous cycle's plan for continuous improvement

Plan for continuous improvement The assessment of these goals at the end of the second year of the MA program's operation has been most helpful in confirming the decisions made by the faculty made after last year's assessment designed to upgrade the program's effectiveness.  The faculty will continue to emphasize special attention to critical thinking about published research.  This emphasis will include additional student critiques of publications in class with oral assessment by the teacher. Interest in the program as indicated by e-mail and telephone inquiries, as well as new admissions, is increasing.  Other SHSU programs, notably Family and Consumer Sciences and Psychology, have begun to send some of their students to us for specific courses.  During the coming year, the faculty plans to consider offering several of its courses online.