OATdb Archive

2008 - 2009

Sociology BS

Goal
Apply Core Concepts
The Sociology BS Program provides students with advanced scientific tools.

Objective
Apply Core Concepts
students who complete the Sociology Program will be able to apply the core concepts of the discipline

Indicator
Two Sociological Papers--Methodology
Two sociological papers written by each graduating student during the Spring semester of his/her senior year are selected. They are evaluated by a three Faculty Member committee appointed by the Chair. The papers are assigned a combined score from 1 to 5 where one is inadequate knowledge of sociology and 5 is excellent knowledge of sociology. Employing their professional expertise in sociology, faculty assign a maximum of two points for the theories presented in the papers, a maximum of two points for the methodologies employed in the papers, and a maximim of one point for the articulation of the papers.
The selection of this indicator responds to disciplinary standards and conforms to contemporary techniques of evaluation research. It was developed in a meeting of the entire faculty in which various options were discussed and critically reviewed.

Criterion
Desired Results--Methodology
At least 80% of papers should be rated 3 or better on the 5 point-scale. Two points can be given for methodology.

Finding
Methodology Component
92% of students writing samples earned a rating of 3 or better and satisfied the requirementStudents that did not performed well had an inadequate knowledge of methodology. It appears that they could not understand items past a very basic understanding of the subject matter.

Action
Methodology component
The Department will assign better quality methodology-based reading in appropriate courses.This action is carried out in order to address the fact that students who do not perform well seem to have problems understanding past basic methodological concepts.

Goal
Understand Core Sociology Concepts
The Sociology BS Program provides students with scientific knowledge to understand society

Objective
Understand Core Concepts
Student will demonstrate competence using scientific tools applied to the understanding of the core concepts of Sociology

Indicator
Two Sociological Papers--Theory
Two sociological papers written by each graduating student during the Spring semester of his/her senior year are selected. They are evaluated by a three Faculty Member committee appointed by the Chair. The papers are assigned a combined score from 1 to 5 where one is inadequate knowledge of sociology and 5 is excellent knowledge of sociology. Employing their professional expertise in sociology, faculty assign a maximum of two points for the theories presented in the papers, a maximum of two points for the methodologies employed in the papers, and a maximim of one point for the articulation of the papers.
The selection of this indicator responds to disciplinary standards and conforms to contemporary techniques of evaluation research. It was developed in a meeting of the entire faculty in which various options were discussed and critically reviewed.

Criterion
Desired Results--Theory
At least 80% of papers should be rated 3 or better on the 5 point scale. Two points may be given in theory.

Finding
Theory component
92% of students writing samples earned a rating of 3 or better and satisfied the requirement.Those who did not performed satisfactory did not completed most of the assigned reading. It is felt that students should complete more assigned readings.

Action
Theory Component
The Department will assign more theory-based readings in required courses. Also during the semester and in required theory-based courses, faculty will check that students complete reading assignments.This action is carried out in order to address the fact that students who do not perform well do not read enough sociological theory.

Goal
Communicate Results
The Sociology BS Program provides students with the scientific tools to be able to communicate scientifically

Objective
Communication Tools
The BS Sociology Program provides studennts with the scientific tools to be able to communicate the results obtained through the application of the core concepts of Sociology

Indicator
Two Sociological Papers--Communication
Two sociological papers written by each graduating student during the Spring semester of his/her senior year are selected. They are evaluated by a three Faculty Member committee appointed by the Chair. The papers are assigned a combined score from 1 to 5 where one is inadequate knowledge of sociology and 5 is excellent knowledge of sociology. Employing their professional expertise in sociology, faculty assign a maximum of two points for the theories presented in the papers, a maximum of two points for the methodologies employed in the papers, and a maximim of one point for the articulation of the papers.
The selection of this indicator responds to disciplinary standards and conforms to contemporary techniques of evaluation research. It was developed in a meeting of the entire faculty in which various options were discussed and critically reviewed.

Criterion
Desired Results--Communication
At least 80% of papers should be rated 3 or better on the 5 point scale. One point may be given for the articulation of the ideas.

Finding
Commnication Component
92% of students writing samples earned a rating of 3 or better and satisfied the requirement.Those who did not perform satisfactorily had problems expressing sociological knowledge using technical terms and analytical definitions in a coherent way.

Action
Communication Component
The Department will assign better quality readings in required courses and increase the number of readings in all courses. Quality and quantity of sociological readings should allow students to have a better understanding of how to articulate sociological knowledge.Furthermore, during the school year students with written communication problems will be encouraged to use available academic resources such as the Writing Center. They will also be encouraged to note how technical terms and expressions are written in journal articles and books.


Update to previous cycle's plan for continuous improvement

Plan for continuous improvement In the case of the goal of ???understanding core concepts,??? Students who did not performed satisfactory did not completed most of the assigned reading. It is felt that students should complete more assigned readings. Also, during the semester and in required theory-based courses, faculty will check that students complete reading assignments. This action is carried out in order to address the fact that students who do not perform well do not read enough sociological theory.

In the case of the goal of ???applying core concepts,??? students that did not performed well had an inadequate knowledge of methodology. It appears that they could not understand items past a very basic understanding of the subject matter. The Department will assign better quality methodology-based reading in appropriate courses. This action is carried out in order to address the fact that students who do not perform well seem to have problems understanding past basic methodological concepts.


In the case of the goal of ???communication tools,??? those who did not perform satisfactorily had problems expressing sociological knowledge using technical terms and analytical definitions in a coherent way. Quality and quantity of sociological readings should allow students to have a better understanding of how to articulate sociological knowledge. Furthermore, during the school year students with written communication problems will be encouraged to use available academic resources such as the ???Writing Center.??? They will also be encouraged to note how technical terms and expressions are written in journal articles and books.